The first time I visited the azuritepress website, I was floored. There is too much information that went over my head. So, naturally, I closed the browser and went to youtube and watched Bewitched. I do that when I get stressed a bit or my brain start feeling being squeezed.
I checked the divinecosmos site and was really impressed with David W's extensive research and layman's explanation of the most scientific things in the universe. The fact that he collaborated with Hoagland with most of the planetary happenings and have the data to prove most of what you think is just theory is just amazing. The 2 hour videos of each and every planet, about pineal glands etc. is very informative.
Reading and hearing the webinar by GOD (Gerald O'Donnell) makes me want to dive into the void and really understand what he is talking about the Source, remote viewing and remote influencing training.
All in all - each one (Ash, David and Gerald) have a different style of presentation and seems like different path and different methods of getting their information from the One, the Source.
1 - Ash get hers through data transmission given to her live in front of an audience by the GA (Guardian Alliance)
2 - David get his information from the Source through dreams that he monitors and jot down as soon as he wakes up in the morning (and he has been doing this for years and years - meaning he must have a roomful of journals).
3 - Gerald does remote viewing and remote influencing
All of them subscribe to the LAW of ONE. That we should go to Source directly, not through intermediary. No one can save us but ourselves. You cannot pay someone, donate to someone to intercede on your behalf. There is an effort involve if we want to get out of here (this masked prison cell called earth - is but a hologram). Its far out mind-boggling idea but if you look at it closer and have an open mind and start questioning things around you - it is by far the best explanation of why and what and where and how we end up here and why we are still here.
The knowledge and information from all three somewhat complements, supplements and supports each others theory (if you want to call it that because you are still are still uncomfortable of calling it FACTS due to previous brainwashing we received from the school system, from the society, from church, from just about anyone outside of ourselves).
So, for now, give yourself a chance and immerse yourself in the sea of information that are presented by these 3 dynamic individuals in this planet. And let me know what you think - lets share and exchange some ideas.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
DIVINITY WITHIN - Day 44 of 108 - Day 4 of NOW - I would much rather know, than be in the dark
Check this out :
http://divinecosmos.com/ research (David Wilcock)
http://www.rt.com/ (news)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/ (news)
- http://projectcamelotportal.com/ whistleblowers
Monday, October 4, 2010
DIVINITY WITHIN - Day 43 of 108 - Day 3 of NOW - What if again
On Day 1 of Now - email from David, LOVE in attitude and responsibility was paraphrased as love the truth of the all-one-ness. Lets try to understand what is all-one-ness. Should there be at-one-ment before we can have all-one-ness? Pretend that we understand that all is one, meaning there is no other... is true, so loving that truth does not mean practicing that truth, loving it does not mean sticking to that truth, it does not mean believing in it.
WTF, there is no use writing because, what is real cannot be expressed, and even if we can somehow manage to express it, words are not sufficient to convey the meaning. Is transference of feelings/emotions enough to convey what we need to express? What is meaning? it is always tainted by filters that each and everyone uses depending on their experiences and beliefs.
WTF, writing used to be so easy but after experiencing soooooo much, it is now hard to convery meanings with just words, words as we know if is so limited.
I guess I have to stop for now and meditate or rather do some more silent sitting and find out what is the easiest way to convey meanings with just mere words.
byeeeeiii,
Joyie108
WTF, there is no use writing because, what is real cannot be expressed, and even if we can somehow manage to express it, words are not sufficient to convey the meaning. Is transference of feelings/emotions enough to convey what we need to express? What is meaning? it is always tainted by filters that each and everyone uses depending on their experiences and beliefs.
WTF, writing used to be so easy but after experiencing soooooo much, it is now hard to convery meanings with just words, words as we know if is so limited.
I guess I have to stop for now and meditate or rather do some more silent sitting and find out what is the easiest way to convey meanings with just mere words.
byeeeeiii,
Joyie108
DIVINITY WITHIN - Day 42 of 108 - Day 2 of NOW - WHAT IF???
Day 2 of NOW - What if .... there is no tomorrow? what if.... there is no yesterday? what if all we really have is NOW? naaaahhhhhhhhhhhh. if that is the case, then we just do whatever we want, no direction, no discipline, no goal, no hope, no dream.
I can kill someone I love or can be super nice to someone I hate, if there is no tomorrow - there is no consequence for my action, what do I care? But, where will the desire to kill or be super nice come from? where will the idea of loving someone or hating someone come from?
The only way "there is ONLY NOW" will work is if there is no memory. When you wake up every morning, it is a clean slate. But as long as there is memory, there will be a past and there will be a future to look forward to.
Whoever started the idea that ifs, buts and maybes are detrimental to one's progress? all throughout history, those who asked the ifs and imagine the maybes end up creating/inventing/discovering something that the others are afraid venture into. So, in actuality, we owe a lot to those people who were brave enough and have the guts to think and utter the ifs, buts and maybes.
So, let us start some ifs here:
1 - what if there is no memory, will we ever move forward or progress at all? what if there is memory but it is messed up, what good will it be?
2 - what if there is only One and that One is bored - but how can one be bored, if there is only one, where will the idea of boredom come from? What if that ONE is all knowing, all powerful and ever present - then, it already know that there is only one - it also know that even if it create anything within itself, it will turn to nothing once it turned off the switch of creation. there is a loophole in the idea of only One. Or the idea is not that simple and it really is very complicated but the ONE try to project that it is simple so the created will be led to believe that it is that simple and not question it, that way the ONE is left alone and can continue to create more complex equations.
3 - what if I stop this nonsense and find something better to do? Can someone give me a few suggestions?
And so it is, and so it shall be.
I can kill someone I love or can be super nice to someone I hate, if there is no tomorrow - there is no consequence for my action, what do I care? But, where will the desire to kill or be super nice come from? where will the idea of loving someone or hating someone come from?
The only way "there is ONLY NOW" will work is if there is no memory. When you wake up every morning, it is a clean slate. But as long as there is memory, there will be a past and there will be a future to look forward to.
Whoever started the idea that ifs, buts and maybes are detrimental to one's progress? all throughout history, those who asked the ifs and imagine the maybes end up creating/inventing/discovering something that the others are afraid venture into. So, in actuality, we owe a lot to those people who were brave enough and have the guts to think and utter the ifs, buts and maybes.
So, let us start some ifs here:
1 - what if there is no memory, will we ever move forward or progress at all? what if there is memory but it is messed up, what good will it be?
2 - what if there is only One and that One is bored - but how can one be bored, if there is only one, where will the idea of boredom come from? What if that ONE is all knowing, all powerful and ever present - then, it already know that there is only one - it also know that even if it create anything within itself, it will turn to nothing once it turned off the switch of creation. there is a loophole in the idea of only One. Or the idea is not that simple and it really is very complicated but the ONE try to project that it is simple so the created will be led to believe that it is that simple and not question it, that way the ONE is left alone and can continue to create more complex equations.
3 - what if I stop this nonsense and find something better to do? Can someone give me a few suggestions?
And so it is, and so it shall be.
DIVINITY WITHIN - Day 41 of 108 - Day 1 of NOW ( email from DAVID )

Day 1 of the NOW - this email was from
"David Lear" and I just thought it is incredibly wonderful rephrase of Attitudes and Responsibilities.
1. LOVE — I Recognize and Love the TRUTH of the ALL-ONE-ness.
2. GRACE — I allow the Grace of the ALL-ONE-ness to Be what IT IS regardless of whether it suits me. I live in Perpetual Forgiveness.
3. GRATITUDE — In Gratitude I appreciate the ALL-ONE-ness and know It to Be my Alive-ness.
4. REVERENT - RESPECT— In Reverence and Respect I acknowledge and give without restraint to the ALL-ONE-ness.
5. RESPONSIBILITY — In Sacred Responsibiity I co-Create with, Serve and am continuously Responsive to the ALL-ONE-ness.
6. TRUST — I know and Trust the Power and Love of the ALL-ONE-ness.
7. ACCOUNTABILITY — In Sacred Accountability I abide in a state of TRUTH with the ALL-ONE-ness.
8. IMPECCABILITY — In Sacred Impeccability I Uphold and Protect the ALL-ONE-ness.
9. MINDFULNESS — In Sacred Continuous Mindfulness, I Love, Nurture, and Attend to the ALL-ONE-ness.
10. FEARLESSNESS — In Nobel Fearlessless I recognize the Eternal Infinite Nature and Unconditional Love of the ALL-ONE-ness.
11. ENGAGED DETACHMENT — In Open-Hearted, Engaged Detachment, I naturally permit the ALL-ONE-ness to BE. I nurture this Blessed State by seeing the Wisdom of refraining from Criticizing, Condemning, or Judging; this opens up Understanding and Validation of the IS-ness of the ALL-ONE-ness.
12. JOY — In Divine Blessed Joy I AM the Eternal Embodiment of ALL-ONE-ness. I AM THAT I AM.
In Loving Gratitude to ALL-ONE-ness,
I AM
David
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)